Dave Johnson, Minnesota Road Research manager, was one of many speakers at the recent Center for Transportation Studies conference held May 24-25 at St. Paul's RiverCentre. Photo by Katie Wright, CTS |
By Craig Wilkins and Kay Korsgaard
This year’s Center for Transportation Studies research conference reflects transportation’s continuing emergence as key national issue.
In its 17 years, the conference has evolved from one that primarily addressed highly technical subjects to one that examines broader transportation-related issues.
Gina Baas, CTS director of communication and outreach, said the research committee has widened the conference’s scope to include relevant topics of interest to researchers, transportation industry members, public policy makers and conference participants.
Conference sponsors include CTS, Mn/DOT and the Local Road Research Bureau.
This year's conference, for example, focused on topics such as data privacy, the political aspects of building the interstate highway system and a workplace that, for the first time, includes members of four generations at once.
Conference participants also explored ways to attract young people to careers as civil engineers and technicians.
Baas said she hopes participants learned how to include divergent points of view early in project planning or when seeking technical solutions to problems rather than “retrofit” them later.
“Our challenge is to understand how to learn from history and conflict and remain open to new views,” she said.
Civil engineering career recruitment
Mike Marti, a manager with SRF Consulting, said an intensive effort similar to Mn/DOT's Phoenix Program is needed that encourages grade-school students' interest in math and the sciences and careers in engineering.
Marti said the outreach effort must be made to replace the large number of engineers and technicians at or near retirement age and to encourage young people to consider civil engineering and other fast-growing fields such as electrical and biomedical engineering.
Generational workplace differences
A new wave of young people from Generations X and Y are gaining influence in the workplace and will continue to change it, said Tom DeCoster, executive director of AASHTO’s Leadership Institute.
DeCoster describes the four generations as Traditionalists, those born between 1900 and 1945; Boomers, those born between 1946 and 1964; Generation X, the generation born between 1965 and 1980, and Generation Y, people born between 1981 and 2000.
Each generation brings its own set of experiences, expectations and values to the workplace, he said; the challenge for managers is to blend each generation’s qualities to produce the best results for the organization and to focus on motivation and retention rather than fret over their differences.
“No one set of generational values is better or worse than another,” he said. “Most disagreement comes from different ways of operating, not lacking the capacity to work.”
Data privacy use in transportation
Collecting personal data related to transportation-related services (e.g., toll lane users, airline passengers, GPS systems that track rental cars, subscribers to in-vehicle location services such as On-Star) was examined with increasing concern about public use and access to private data in the post-9/11 era.
Colin Bennett, political science professor at the University of Victoria in British Columbia, led a panel on the risks to privacy when data collection practices to measure and plan transportation programs conflict with a growing concern about data privacy among Americans.
Bennett said 70 percent of Americans value privacy over technological advancement as compared with 26 percent of Europeans. He and the other the panelists said Americans value privacy highly, citing the Fourth Amendment which puts limits on the power of the state.
Bennett and his fellow panelists concluded there is no simple answer to a host of privacy concerns, but did agree citizens' trust can be earned only when the purpose of data collection and use is clearly understood.
Panel members said lack of effective controls on the collection and use of data for commercial purposes erodes public trust in legitimate data-gathering activities.
"People will accept collecting data when they believe we are gathering information by the right people for the right purpose," Bennett said.
Political influence on building the interstate system in the Twin Cities
Patricia Cavanaugh, Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, examined the political history of building the Interstate Highway System in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. She studied seven local cases to analyze how decisions are made regarding freeway development.
The projects she studied fell into three distinct eras.
The “mega-projects era,” 1956 through the late 1960s, she said, was a time when public sentiment strongly favored the interstate system. There was strong support of gas tax increases to further fund highway projects and disputes about them were relatively minor. Projects completed during this era include I-94 from downtown St. Paul to Minneapolis and the I-35W/Hwy 62 commons area known as the Crosstown Highway.
She calls the decades from 1970 to 1990 the “expanding the debate era.” Projects changed or dropped include I-35E south of St. Paul , I-394 west of Minneapolis , I-94 from the beltline to the St. Croix River and the never-completed I-335 segment to connect I-35W and I-94 in the north ring of Minneapolis. During this time there was more legislative and citizen involvement and a general disenchantment with government. Citizens, Cavanaugh said, were growing more skeptical and aware of the costs and benefits of interstate highway programs.
Federal legislation also had and impact on what was built. The 1973 Federal Highway Act allowed Interstate funds to be spent on other projects, allowing the I-335 project to be dropped and its funding used for other purposes.
The 1990s, she said, ushered in the “era of falling behind.” Finances were scarcer and there was no longer the same push; public support for an expanding interstate system was waning, she added.
Cavanaugh’s presentation was followed by three political leaders who discussed the way politics can help or hinder the highway development process and how Mn/DOT and other agencies can draw on expertise gained during the last 50 years to help make better transportation planning decisions in the future.
Carol Flynn, who served several terms in the Legislature, said that the election process encourages a parochial approach in decision-making because elected officials must represent their constituents’ needs –and recommended jokingly that people should not run for office unless they are older and have a broader perspective.
Connie Kozlak, Metropolitan Council, said that the council works behind the scenes more than people realize to create a broader vision for transportation planning.
Curt Johnson, Citistates Group, said that public hearings, one of the traditional ways of gaining public input, come too late in the process to be effective.
“We need better ways to get public input into our decision-making processes,” he said. “Our current debate assumes the public is ambivalent about growth. But we need to decide if the Twin Cities will be an urban place or one that continues to pursue a low-density lifestyle. We need to connect the policy puzzle with the same people in the same room at the same time.”
|